ADGM H1 2026: 54% AUM Growth and Nearly 14,000 Active Licences

According to the ADGM H1 2026 performance announcement, Abu Dhabi Global Market (ADGM) recorded broad-based expansion during the first half of 2026, with Assets Under Management (AUM) increasing 54% year on year, active licences reaching 13,974, and the workforce growing to 49,027 professionals.

 

The results, also highlighted by the Abu Dhabi Media Office, reflect simultaneous growth across capital, business activity and talent within the jurisdiction. According to ADGM, the increase in active licences positioned it as the largest international financial centre (IFC) in the MEASA region by this specific measure. The significance of ADGM H1 2026 results lies not only in individual milestones, but in the wider expansion of its financial ecosystem.

ADGM H1 2026 Numbers at a Glance

The key figures from ADGM H1 2026 highlight expansion across asset management, business activity, financial services and workforce growth. According to ADGM’s H1 2026 performance announcement, Assets Under Management (AUM) increased by 54% year on year, while fund managers, active licences and financial services entities continued to expand.

Metric H1 2026 Result
Assets Under Management (AUM) +54% year on year
Fund and asset managers 190
Funds managed from ADGM 276
Active licences 13,974
Operational entities 3,986
Financial services entities 392
Workforce 49,027 professionals
AI-focused capital deployed from ADGM More than USD 100 billion

The figures reflect growth across capital, institutions and talent, rather than a single performance indicator. ADGM also reported that active licences increased from 13,353 at the end of Q1 2026 to 13,974 by H1 2026. 

Asset Management Remains the Main Growth Engine

Asset management remained a central driver of ADGM H1 2026 performance, with growth extending across assets under management, fund managers and the number of funds managed from the jurisdiction. ADGM’s official H1 results show that this was not a one-period movement: the jurisdiction says its AUM growth trajectory has continued uninterrupted since the beginning of 2022. ADGM’s official H1 2026 performance announcement

AUM Grows 54% Year on Year

Asset management continued to be one of the strongest contributors to ADGM H1 2026 growth. According to ADGM’s H1 2026 performance announcement, Assets Under Management (AUM) within ADGM increased by 54% year on year compared with H1 2025. The reported figure represents the growth rate in AUM; the announcement does not disclose an absolute H1 2026 AUM value.

 

ADGM states that this performance extends an uninterrupted growth trend since the beginning of 2022, indicating sustained expansion in its asset-management ecosystem.

More Managers and Funds Deepen the Ecosystem

The depth of the ecosystem also expanded, with ADGM asset managers and fund managers reaching 190 in H1 2026, up 23% from 154 in H1 2025. ADGM reported that 11 managers were added during Q2 alone, its strongest quarterly increase. Funds managed from ADGM increased to 276, representing a 32% rise from 209 in H1 2025. See the official ADGM H1 2026 figures. 

 

The expansion included international firms establishing, launching or expanding their presence in ADGM, including Capital Group, Man Group, Bain Capital and Blue Owl.

 

ADGM also reported that asset managers establishing operations in the jurisdiction during H1 2026 collectively oversee more than USD 2.1 trillion in global AUM. This figure represents the global assets managed by those institutions and should not be interpreted as ADGM’s own AUM.

Active Licences Near 14,000 as ADGM’s Operating Base Expands

The growth in ADGM active licences during H1 2026 was accompanied by a substantial increase in operational entities, indicating that expansion was not limited to new registrations. According to ADGM’s official H1 2026 results, the jurisdiction continued to expand across licensing activity and operational presence, strengthening the depth of the Abu Dhabi Global Market 2026 ecosystem.

13,974 Active Licences and 1,814 Issued in H1

Business activity continued to expand during ADGM H1 2026, with the total number of active licences reaching 13,974. According to ADGM’s H1 2026 performance announcement, 1,814 licences were issued during the first six months of 2026. This figure represents licences issued during the period and should not be interpreted as the net increase in active licences.

 

ADGM states that the 13,974 active-licence count makes it the largest international financial centre (IFC) in the MEASA region by this specific indicator.

Operational Entities Reach 3,986

The expansion extends beyond registrations. Operational entities reached 3,986 at H1 2026, up 34% from 2,972 at H1 2025, according to ADGM’s official H1 2026 data. ADGM’s ecosystem includes operating companies and financial institutions alongside holding and investment structures used to establish and manage business and investment activities within the jurisdiction.

 

This distinction matters: active licences and operational entities are separate measures, and the latter provides additional evidence of operating depth within ADGM. Businesses considering setting up a holding structure in ADGM should assess the appropriate legal structure, permitted activities and applicable licensing requirements rather than interpreting the headline licence count as the number of operating companies.

Regulated Financial Services Continue to Scale

Growth in ADGM financial services entities continued alongside the wider expansion of the jurisdiction in H1 2026. According to ADGM’s official H1 2026 results, the number of financial services entities operating in ADGM reached 392, up 27% from 308 at the end of H1 2025.

 

During the same period, the ADGM FSRA issued 50 In-Principle Approvals (IPAs) to financial services firms and granted 45 new Financial Services Permissions (FSPs). These figures indicate continued entry into ADGM’s regulated financial-services market, but they should not be treated as equivalent stages of authorisation. Under the FSRA’s official application process, successful applicants first receive an IPA subject to pre-conditions; an FSP is granted once the applicable conditions are satisfied and authorises the firm to commence the relevant regulated activities.

 

This distinction is important because an ADGM commercial licence alone does not authorise a firm to carry on regulated financial activities. ADGM separately identifies the Registration Authority and FSRA as independent authorities, with the Registration Authority responsible for incorporation and commercial licensing and the FSRA responsible for financial-services regulation and supervision.

 

The regulatory framework is also supported by ADGM’s independent legal system. The ADGM Courts framework provides for the direct application of English common law, including principles of equity, within the ADGM legal framework.

Workforce Nears 50,000 as the Talent Base Deepens

The expansion of ADGM H1 2026 was also reflected in its talent base. According to ADGM’s official H1 2026 results, the combined workforce across Al Maryah Island and Al Reem Island reached 49,027 professionals, increasing by 4,688 during the first half of 2026 and representing 34% year-on-year growth.

 

The growth in ADGM workforce 2026 has been accompanied by investment in local skills development. The Abu Dhabi Media Office’s official coverage confirms that ADGM Academy trained 1,607 Emirati nationals during H1 2026. The Academy also launched the WMI School of AI, providing more than 19 practitioner-led courses and training over 544 UAE Nationals in agentic AI.

 

Together, workforce expansion and specialised training are strengthening the human-capital base supporting ADGM’s broader financial and investment ecosystem.

ADGM Adds an AI-Capital and Digital-Operations Dimension

Artificial intelligence has become an additional dimension of ADGM H1 2026 growth, combining institutional AI investment with the digital transformation of ADGM’s own regulatory and operational functions. According to ADGM’s H1 2026 performance announcement, the jurisdiction has attracted significant AI-focused capital while simultaneously expanding the use of technology across its internal processes.

More than USD 100bn in AI-focused capital

ADGM reported that more than USD 100 billion in AI-focused capital is deployed from the jurisdiction by institutions established within ADGM. This figure represents capital associated with those institutions and should not be interpreted as an investment budget or capital allocation made by ADGM itself.

 

The AI investment ecosystem includes MGX, a global investment platform focused on artificial intelligence infrastructure and advanced technologies, which operates from ADGM. ADGM also highlighted initiatives involving entities such as RIQ, Swiss Re and RealAssetX Abu Dhabi as examples of AI-related activity connected with the jurisdiction.

ADGM’s own AI rollout and AED 400m technology roadmap

Alongside external investment activity, ADGM has been applying artificial intelligence across its own operations. During the first phase of implementation, AI was deployed across 25 business functions covering licensing, supervision and customer service. ADGM reported that these deployments reduced manual workload by more than 5,000 staff hours annually and enabled approximately 25% of customer enquiries to be resolved instantly through digital channels. 

 

Separately, ADGM plans to invest more than AED 400 million through 2029 to expand AI capabilities, strengthen digital infrastructure and modernise regulatory and operational systems. This investment represents ADGM’s technology roadmap and is separate from the USD 100 billion in AI-focused capital deployed by institutions established in the jurisdiction.

Regulatory and Legal Infrastructure Is Expanding Alongside the Market

The growth of ADGM H1 2026 was accompanied by continued development of its regulatory and legal infrastructure. Rather than focusing only on market expansion, ADGM’s first-half developments also demonstrate an emphasis on strengthening supervision, governance and dispute-resolution mechanisms across financial and commercial activities.

Regulatory Changes in H1 2026

During H1 2026, the ADGM Financial Services Regulatory Authority (FSRA) introduced several regulatory enhancements across key areas. These included updated requirements relating to insurance and climate-related financial risk management, finalisation of the virtual asset staking framework, and enhancements to the anti-money laundering framework. (ADGM FSRA insurance and climate-risk update) (ADGM FSRA virtual asset staking framework)

 

Beyond financial services, ADGM also introduced a Broker Classification Framework for real estate activities, reflecting broader efforts to strengthen market standards. Any references to crypto-mining initiatives should be treated separately and described as proposals or discussion papers unless a final regulatory framework has been issued.

Courts and Dispute Resolution Also Show Higher Usage

The expansion of ADGM’s ecosystem has also been reflected in demand for dispute-resolution services. According to ADGM Courts, the Courts exceeded the total caseload recorded during 2025 by 1 July 2026, indicating increased utilisation of the jurisdiction’s legal framework.

 

Additional developments, including the Mediation Hub MENA memorandum of understanding and the IACA Global Passport initiative, further support ADGM’s broader dispute-resolution ecosystem.

 

The legal certainty offered by ADGM’s framework is supported by the direct application of English common law principles within the jurisdiction. Businesses evaluating this structure can also refer to TaxAdepts’ guide on ADGM English common law for international investors for further context on the legal environment.

What the H1 2026 Results Mean for Businesses and Investors

The ADGM H1 2026 results point to a larger and more diverse business ecosystem, but growth does not reduce the regulatory requirements attached to operating in the jurisdiction. For asset managers and funds, a deeper peer network creates greater market presence, while firms conducting regulated financial activities must still follow the ADGM FSRA authorisation process and obtain the appropriate Financial Services Permission before commencing those activities.

 

For holding, investment and operating companies, increasing licence and entity numbers signal continued demand for ADGM structures. However, incorporation should be aligned with the intended legal structure, permitted business activities and licensing requirements, as explained in ADGM’s official setting-up guidance.

 

Compliance obligations remain equally important as the market expands. ADGM strengthened its commercial legislation in 2026 to enhance regulatory transparency and its AML/CFT framework, including changes concerning beneficial ownership. Businesses should therefore maintain accurate ownership information and consider the applicable governance and regulatory requirements. ADGM’s beneficial ownership guidance provides further detail on these obligations.

 

Tax treatment also requires separate assessment. ADGM status does not automatically provide a 0% Corporate Tax outcome; the Federal Tax Authority’s Free Zone Person guidance confirms that the 0% rate applies to Qualifying Free Zone Persons on Qualifying Income, subject to prescribed conditions.

 

Businesses evaluating ADGM should assess licensing, regulatory, tax, accounting and governance requirements together before selecting a structure.

Conclusion: ADGM’s H1 2026 Growth Is Broad-Based, Not a Single-Metric Story

The ADGM H1 2026 results point to broad-based expansion rather than reliance on a single headline measure. ADGM’s official H1 2026 results show 54% year-on-year AUM growth, 13,974 active licences, a workforce of 49,027 and 392 financial services entities, alongside increasing AI-focused capital and digital investment. The Abu Dhabi Media Office also highlights the breadth of this growth. The key question now is whether this momentum across capital, businesses, talent and technology can be sustained through H2 2026.

FAQs

No. In its H1 2026 performance announcement, ADGM reported that Assets Under Management (AUM) increased by 54% year on year. However, the announcement did not disclose an absolute H1 2026 AUM value.

No. The USD 2.1 trillion figure relates to the global AUM overseen by asset managers that established operations in ADGM during H1 2026. It represents the assets managed by those institutions globally and should not be interpreted as ADGM’s own AUM.

No. Active licences and operating entities represent different measures. According to ADGM’s H1 2026 results, ADGM reported 13,974 active licences and separately reported 3,986 operational entities.

No. A Financial Services Permission is required only for firms carrying out regulated financial activities under the ADGM Financial Services Regulatory Authority (FSRA) framework. Other ADGM entities may operate under commercial licences issued through the relevant ADGM registration process.

An In-Principle Approval (IPA) is conditional approval granted by FSRA, generally subject to the applicant satisfying specified conditions before proceeding. A Financial Services Permission (FSP) is granted once the applicable requirements are fulfilled and permits the firm to conduct approved regulated activities. Details are available in the FSRA application process guidance.

No. The figure of 190 represents the total number of fund and asset managers operating in ADGM at H1 2026. This compares with 154 in H1 2025. ADGM reported that 11 managers were added during Q2 2026, contributing to the overall increase.

According to ADGM, the jurisdiction became the largest international financial centre (IFC) in the Middle East, Africa and South Asia (MEASA) region based on the number of active licences. This statement relates specifically to active licence count and should not be interpreted as a ranking by AUM, market capitalisation or every other financial metric.

No. According to ADGM’s H1 2026 announcement, the more than USD 100 billion figure relates to AI-focused capital deployed from ADGM by institutions established in the jurisdiction. It is not ADGM’s own investment budget.

No. The two figures relate to different activities. The USD 100 billion refers to AI-focused capital deployed by institutions operating from ADGM, while the AED 400 million represents ADGM’s own technology investment roadmap through 2029 covering digital infrastructure, AI capabilities and regulatory systems.

No. Establishing an entity in ADGM does not automatically result in a 0% Corporate Tax rate. Under the UAE Corporate Tax regime, a Free Zone Person must satisfy the requirements to qualify as a Qualifying Free Zone Person and earn Qualifying Income. Corporate Tax registration and compliance obligations may still apply.

References

Related Articles​​

UAE VAT Amendments 2026: Key Changes Under Federal Decree-Law No. 16

The Federal Tax Authority issued VAT Public Clarification VATP046 on 4 September 2026, explaining the key amendments made to the UAE VAT framework through Federal Decree-Law No. 16 of 2024 and Federal Decree-Law No. 16 of 2025.

 

The clarification covers practical changes affecting reverse charge procedures, input VAT recovery, excess recoverable VAT, electronic tax invoices and credit notes, and the treatment of input VAT linked to tax evasion. 

 

The amendments were introduced in two stages

  1. changes under Federal Decree-Law No. 16 of 2024 applied from 30 October 2024,

  2. latest amendments became effective on 1 January 2026.

For businesses, these updates require a review of VAT processes, documentation and internal controls. The sections below explain what has changed and what finance teams should update.

Quick Summary: Key Takeaways

  • From 1 January 2026, businesses covered by the reverse charge mechanism no longer need to issue a tax invoice to themselves for relevant Concerned Goods and Concerned Services.

  • The five-year period for recovering excess recoverable VAT now runs from the end of the Tax Period in which the excess arose.

  • Under Article 54 (bis), input VAT may be rejected where a supply is linked to tax evasion and the taxable person knew, or should have known, about that connection.

  • Finance teams should review reverse-charge workflows, VAT credit balances, and supplier due diligence controls against the amended rules before the next filing.

What Are the Latest UAE VAT Amendments?

Federal Decree-Law No. 8 of 2017 remains the framework for VAT in the UAE. What changed in 2026 was not the creation of a new VAT law, but a set of amendments to that framework.

 

The FTA’s VAT Public Clarification VATP046 explains those amendments. It does not create new rules on its own. The clarification brings together changes affecting the reverse charge mechanism, input VAT recovery, excess recoverable VAT, tax invoices and credit notes, tax-evasion-related input VAT, and limitation rules.

 

For businesses, the dates matter because the amendments did not all start at once.

 

30 Oct 2024 → first amendments took effect
1 Jan 2026 → latest VAT changes took effect
4 Sep 2026 → VATP046 issued by the FTA

Key UAE VAT Changes 2026 Effective From 1 January 2026

The 2026 amendments are not all about adding compliance steps. One of the clearest changes removes one. Others tighten how VAT credits are claimed and supported.

Area Old Rule New Rule from 1 January 2026
Reverse charge Businesses generally issued a tax invoice to themselves for relevant Concerned Goods and Concerned Services. Self-invoicing is no longer required for the covered imports. VAT must still be accounted for under the reverse charge mechanism.
Excess recoverable VAT The previous rules did not contain the same five-year period now set out in Article 74. The five-year period runs from the end of the Tax Period in which the excess recoverable VAT arose.
Input VAT and tax evasion There was no equivalent Article 54 (bis) provision in this form. Input VAT may be rejected where a supply or supply chain is linked to tax evasion and the business knew, or should have known, about the connection.
Limitation rules Article 79 (bis) contained limitation provisions within the VAT Decree-Law. Article 79 (bis) has been repealed. The relevant limitation rules are dealt with under the Federal Tax Procedures Law.

Reverse Charge Mechanism: Self-Invoicing Requirement Removed

Under amended Article 48, a taxable person importing relevant Concerned Goods or Concerned Services no longer has to issue a tax invoice to itself for those transactions.

 

That removes an administrative step. It does not remove the reverse charge mechanism itself.

 

The business must still account for VAT correctly and keep the supporting records required under the VAT rules. Supplier invoices, customs documents, and other evidence remain important.

 

For example, if a UAE business imports a service covered by the reverse charge after 1 January 2026, it no longer creates a self-issued tax invoice for that VAT. The VAT entry remains.

Five-Year Rule for Excess Recoverable VAT

Article 74 sets a defined period for excess recoverable VAT. The five-year period starts from the end of the Tax Period in which the excess arose.

 

This makes old VAT credit balances time-sensitive.

 

A business with long-standing credits should identify when each balance arose, check whether it can be offset, and consider a refund application before the deadline.

 

The FTA gives a simple example. If excess recoverable VAT arose in the Tax Period ending 31 January 2026, the five-year period ends on 31 January 2031.

New Rule on Input VAT Linked to Tax Evasion — Article 54 (bis)

Article 54 (bis) adds a more direct risk to input VAT recovery.

 

The FTA may reject recoverable input tax where a supply, or a supply chain, is connected to tax evasion and the taxable person knew or should have known about that connection.

 

For finance teams, this turns supplier checks into a VAT control issue, not just a procurement formality. Businesses should be able to show why a supplier and transaction appeared genuine before input VAT was claimed.

 

FTA Decision No. 13 of 2026 supports this area by setting out measures for verifying the validity and integrity of supplies. That makes documented due diligence especially important where transactions or suppliers show unusual features.

Repeal of Article 79 (bis)

Article 79 (bis) has been removed from the VAT Decree-Law because limitation matters are dealt with under the Federal Tax Procedures Law.

 

This is separate from Article 74. The five-year rule for excess recoverable VAT is a specific recovery deadline and should not be confused with the wider limitation framework.

What About the 2024 VAT Amendments?

The 2024 amendments took effect on 30 October 2024 and form the earlier part of the changes now explained in VATP046. Among the more relevant updates were changes to the definition of a non-resident person and the introduction of terms linked to electronic invoicing. 

 

The law also added requirements around electronic tax invoices and electronic tax credit notes, laying part of the legal groundwork for the UAE’s e-invoicing programme.

 

These changes matter, but they are not the main focus here. The more immediate issue for businesses is what changed from 1 January 2026 and how those rules affect VAT compliance.

What Do These VAT Changes Mean for UAE Businesses?

For finance teams, the 2026 amendments are less about learning a new VAT system and more about fixing the processes already in place.

 

Start with reverse-charge transactions dated from 1 January 2026. If your workflow still creates self-issued tax invoices for covered imports, that step should be reviewed. The VAT accounting remains, but the documentation process has changed.

 

Supplier checks also need more attention. Where input VAT is claimed, businesses should keep enough evidence to show that the supplier, transaction, and supporting documents are genuine. That may mean reviewing onboarding checks, contracts, invoices, payment records and unusual transaction patterns.

 

Older VAT credit balances deserve a separate review. Identify when each excess recoverable VAT amount arose and track the five years from the end of that Tax Period. Leaving large credits on the balance sheet without monitoring the deadline can reduce the time available to consider a refund.

 

Electronic invoicing is another area to prepare for. Finance teams should check whether their ERP or accounting system can support the UAE’s requirements and align system changes with the Ministry of Finance’s phased e-invoicing implementation.

 

Finally, businesses should update VAT SOPs and brief staff on the revised procedures. A process that worked in 2025 may no longer reflect the current rules. The review should cover responsibilities, supporting evidence, exception handling, and the controls applied before each VAT return is filed.

UAE VAT Compliance Checklist for 2026

A short review now can prevent gaps from carrying into future VAT periods.

  •  Review transactions against the amended UAE VAT provisions.

  •  Check reverse-charge transactions dated from 1 January 2026.

  •  Review input VAT recovery controls and supporting documents.

  •  Strengthen supplier and transaction due diligence.

  •  Identify old excess recoverable VAT balances and track deadlines.

  •  Check your e-invoicing readiness and system requirements.

  •  Update VAT procedures and train relevant finance staff.

  •  Monitor new FTA and MoF guidance as it is issued.

How ADEPTS Can Help With UAE VAT Compliance

ADEPTS supports businesses with VAT compliance reviews, reverse-charge and input VAT assessments, documentation checks, e-invoicing readiness, and wider tax advisory.

 

If your existing processes have not yet been reviewed against the UAE VAT amendments 2026, now is a good time to do so.

 

Need help understanding how the latest changes affect your business? 

 

Speak with ADEPTS for a practical VAT compliance review.

FAQs:

They update rules around reverse charge, input VAT recovery, excess recoverable VAT, tax documentation, tax-evasion-related transactions, and limitation provisions.

The latest amendments took effect on 1 January 2026. Earlier amendments covered by VATP046 became effective on 30 October 2024.

No. For the covered Concerned Goods and Concerned Services, self-issued tax invoices are no longer required from 1 January 2026.

The five-year period runs from the end of the Tax Period in which the excess recoverable VAT first arose.

Yes. Recovery may be denied where the business knew, or should have known, that the supply or supply chain was connected to tax evasion.

VATP046 is an FTA clarification explaining VAT amendments introduced through Federal Decree-Law No. 16 of 2024 and No. 16 of 2025.

References

Related Articles​​

Khalifa Fund Launches MZN Markets at Yas Mall to Fast-Track 100+ Emirati Retail Startups

A good product can attract attention online. A retail business has a harder test: will someone stop, walk in, and actually buy?

 

That is the gap the Khalifa Fund for Enterprise Development is trying to address with MZN Markets. Launched on 26 August 2026, the initiative brings emerging Emirati brands into Ether at Yas Mall, giving them direct exposure to customers in a live retail environment. The Khalifa Fund MZN Markets programme is expected to support more than 100 Emirati startups and SMEs as it expands across Abu Dhabi.

 

The idea goes beyond providing shelf space. 

 

It adds a practical, market-facing layer to Emirati startup support in Abu Dhabi: founders can see how customers respond to their products, build commercial experience and prepare for the next stage of growth. It also fits into the UAE’s push to build billion-dollar Emirati startups, where access to markets matters alongside funding and business support.

 

But what does a place inside MZN Markets actually give a founder, and how does the model differ from taking on a conventional retail unit? That starts with how the space at Ether, Yas Mall is designed to work.

Why Khalifa Fund Is Pairing Funding With a Retail Testing Ground

Funding can help a founder produce more stock, hire people, or invest in marketing, but it cannot answer one crucial question: 

 

Will customers buy the product in a real retail setting?

 

That is where MZN Markets changes the usual support model.

 

The Khalifa Fund for Enterprise Development already supports Emirati businesses through funding, capability building and market-access programmes. With MZN Markets, the focus moves closer to the customer. Founders can put their products in front of shoppers, observe demand and learn what needs to change before making larger commitments.

The commercial-readiness gap KFED is targeting

According to the Abu Dhabi Media Office, MZN Markets were designed partly around the difficulty startups face when turning an idea into a commercially ready business.

 

That gap often becomes clearer once a product moves into a live retail environment. Something that performs well through social media or a small launch may attract a very different response on a shop floor, where pricing sits next to competitors, packaging has to work harder, and customer reactions are immediate. Founders can also see which products draw attention and, more importantly, which ones convert into actual sales.

 

MZN Markets gives participating businesses room to test those assumptions before scaling.

 

For founders who do gain traction, the next decisions become more financial: how much inventory to carry, whether to take permanent premises, how to finance expansion, and how quickly to grow. 

 

That is where capital structuring for early-stage UAE startups and SMEs becomes increasingly relevant.

The Ether partnership structure

The programme starts at Ether in Yas Mall through a partnership between Khalifa Fund and Ether.

 

Ether was built around a co-retail model rather than the conventional approach of every brand taking a full standalone shop. Earlier reporting described the concept as a way for emerging brands to test physical retail through shared spaces before committing to a larger retail footprint.

 

Under the new Khalifa Fund MZN Markets initiative, that model becomes part of a wider founder-development programme. The official announcement says participating local brands can access different retail formats, ranging from temporary pop-ups to potential permanent units at Yas Mall.

 

The partnership is also intended to extend beyond one location. MZN Markets is planned to expand into additional retail destinations across Abu Dhabi, creating a possible progression from product testing to wider market access.

The Training and Mentorship Built Into the Programme

Selling from a busy mall creates useful data. Knowing what to do with it is another matter.

 

That is why the programme combines retail exposure with structured capability building rather than leaving founders to learn entirely by trial and error.

Sales, financial planning and customer experience coaching

The official MZN Markets programme includes targeted training and mentorship in four areas: 

  • sales, 
  • financial planning, 
  • marketing
  • customer experience.

Those areas are closely connected.

 

A founder may discover that a product sells well but produces a weak margin. Another may have healthy margins but poor conversion. A third may attract first-time customers without generating repeat purchases. Financial planning helps put numbers around those results, while sales, marketing and customer-experience support can help founders understand what needs to improve.

 

This makes Emirati startup support in Abu Dhabi more practical. Instead of treating training and market access as separate stages, MZN Markets lets founders apply what they learn while their products are tested in front of real customers.

Networking with retail developers beyond Yas Mall

The opportunity is not limited to selling from Ether.

 

The official announcement also identifies networking with retail developers as part of the programme. That matters for businesses that prove their concept and are ready to look beyond a temporary retail format.

 

A successful pop-up, however, does not automatically make a business ready to scale. Moving into a permanent unit or expanding into other locations introduces another layer of decisions around licensing, legal structure, accounting, tax, and financial controls.

 

That is where the founder journey starts moving from market testing to building a business that can operate at scale.

From Pop-Up Slot to Registered UAE Company: What Founders Still Need to Sort Out

A successful retail test answers one question: does the market want the product?

 

It does not settle everything that comes next.

 

As founders move from temporary retail exposure towards a permanent operation, decisions around licensing, legal structure, accounting and tax become more important. Some MZN Markets participants may already have these in place. Others may need to formalise or expand their existing setup as sales grow.

Trade licence, legal form and ICV steps

The starting point is the business licence.

 

The Abu Dhabi Department of Economic Development requires businesses to identify the appropriate activity, legal form, and licensing route before operating. Depending on the business model, this could include an LLC or another permitted structure, while the selected economic activity must match what the business actually does.

 

For founders considering business setup in Abu Dhabi mainland, the choice should be based on where and how the company expects to operate rather than simply choosing the fastest incorporation route. 

 

Our guide on why Abu Dhabi mainland suits first-time entrepreneurs explains some of those considerations, while founders ready to establish an entity can review the process for setting up a mainland company in Abu Dhabi.

 

ICV comes later for many retail businesses.

 

A National In-Country Value certificate is not required simply because a startup begins selling products. It becomes more relevant where a growing company wants to compete for procurement opportunities with participating government, semi-government or large private-sector organisations. The Ministry of Industry and Advanced Technology maintains the National ICV programme and its authorised certification framework.

 

For a founder moving from consumer retail into larger B2B or government-linked contracts, preparing for ICV early can therefore become commercially useful.

Bookkeeping, VAT and Corporate Tax registration triggers once sales start

The first sale should also be the point at which financial records start becoming disciplined.

 

Good records help founders understand margins, inventory, cash flow and operating costs. They also support later VAT filings, Corporate Tax compliance and financial reporting. For a growing retailer, accounting and bookkeeping for a new retail business should therefore develop alongside sales, not several months after them.

 

VAT requires close monitoring.

 

According to the Federal Tax Authority, a UAE-resident business must generally register for VAT when taxable supplies and imports exceed AED 375,000 over the previous 12 months, or are expected to exceed that amount within the next 30 days. Voluntary registration may be available once the relevant value exceeds AED 187,500.

 

Corporate Tax works differently. A UAE-incorporated juridical person that is subject to Corporate Tax is generally required to register with the FTA; the AED 375,000 VAT threshold does not determine whether a company must register for Corporate Tax. 

 

The FTA’s Corporate Tax registration guidance should therefore be considered from the company-formation stage rather than only after turnover reaches a particular level.

 

That distinction matters as an SME business setup Abu Dhabi moves from testing demand to running a fully operational company.

How ADEPTS Supports Emirati Founders Scaling Out of MZN Markets

Market validation is only useful if the business behind the product is ready for what comes next.

 

ADEPTS supports founders as they move from early commercial testing towards a structured UAE business. This can include selecting an appropriate legal and licensing structure, establishing accounting records, monitoring VAT obligations, handling Corporate Tax compliance and preparing for ICV certification where it becomes commercially relevant.

 

The objective is not to add unnecessary processes to an early-stage business. It is to put the right controls in place as the company grows, so that expansion does not create avoidable licensing, tax or reporting problems later.

Conclusion

MZN Markets gives Emirati founders something that funding alone cannot provide: direct evidence of how their products perform in front of real customers.

 

For some businesses, a pop-up may confirm that the concept needs more work. For others, it could be the point where a small brand starts preparing for permanent retail space, a larger customer base and wider expansion across Abu Dhabi.

 

That is where the next challenge begins.

 

Khalifa Fund can help create the opportunity to test the market. Founders still need to build the legal, financial and tax structure capable of supporting the business once that test succeeds.

References

Related Articles​​

MoF & DIFC Academy Launch Certified Finance Leader Programmes

The UAE is raising the bar for financial leadership in government.

 

On 18 August 2026, the UAE Ministry of Finance signed a strategic partnership with DIFC Academy to develop the next generation of financial leaders and advisers. The initiative brings leadership, strategic finance and emerging technology into one professional-development framework.

 

The timing is notable. Government finance is becoming more data-driven, technology-enabled and strategically focused. The partnership reflects that shift — and the strong emphasis on artificial intelligence makes it more than a conventional training initiative.

What Did the UAE Ministry of Finance and DIFC Academy Announce?

The Ministry of Finance UAE and DIFC Academy agreed to launch two programmes:

  • Certified Chief Finance Director Programme UAE
  • Certified Financial Consultant Programme

Signed at the Ministry’s Dubai offices, the agreement is intended to strengthen financial leadership and advisory capabilities across federal entities.

 

According to the official WAM announcement, participants will develop advanced knowledge and practical skills for stronger strategic financial decision-making. DIFC has also confirmed the partnership through its official announcement.

 

The initiative also fits within the UAE’s wider focus on stronger public financial management and government capability, alongside developments covered in our analysis of the UAE Federal Budget 2026.

What Are the Two New Finance Programmes?

The two programmes are designed for financial leaders and advisers working across federal entities. Their focus is practical: improve leadership, financial analysis, strategic planning, advisory capability and the use of emerging technologies.

 

For now, several details remain unpublished.

 

The Ministry and DIFC Academy have not yet announced eligibility requirements, programme duration, fees, intake dates or application procedures. As of 19 August 2026, the DIFC Academy School of Finance also does not list either programme separately.

Field Confirmed detail
Programmes Chief Finance Director; Financial Consultant
Audience Federal financial leaders and executives
Focus Leadership, AI, strategic finance and advisory
Delivery In-person, online and hybrid
Fees / duration / eligibility Not yet announced

The more important question is what participants will actually learn — particularly how artificial intelligence is being built into financial leadership training.

Why Is This Partnership Significant for the UAE Financial Sector?

This is not simply the launch of two new DIFC Academy courses.

 

The Ministry’s focus is not limited to better financial systems. It is also about developing the people who will use them. Modern financial leadership now calls for more than accurate reporting; it requires sound judgement, stronger analytical skills and the ability to work confidently with new technology.

 

DIFC Academy already supports this through a mix of in-person, hybrid, digital and self-paced learning. Its programmes are also backed by relationships with recognised professional bodies such as CFA Institute, IMA and CMT Association.

 

For DIFC, building financial talent is part of a wider ambition. Arif Amiri, CEO of DIFC Authority, has linked stronger professional capability with economic diversification and the UAE’s long-term competitiveness as a financial centre.

 

That fits with Dubai’s broader progress in global finance, including its recent seventh-place ranking in the Global Financial Centres Index.

 

The next section looks at the four learning pillars behind the programmes — including the role artificial intelligence is expected to play.

What Will the Programmes Cover? The Four Core Learning Pillars

The new DIFC Academy programmes are built around four areas:

  1. Leadership Development — strengthening leadership and decision-making skills.

  2. Artificial Intelligence — applying AI tools to modern financial work.

  3. Financial Analysis & Strategic Planning — improving analysis, forecasting and strategic decision-making.

  4. Financial Advisory — developing stronger advisory capabilities for complex financial matters.

The programmes will be delivered in-person, online and through hybrid formats, giving federal professionals flexibility to learn alongside their existing responsibilities.

How Will Artificial Intelligence Be Integrated Into the Curriculum?

AI will be treated as a practical finance tool, not a standalone technology topic.

 

According to the official WAM announcement, participants will learn how AI can support complex financial-data analysis, intelligent reporting, process automation and predictive forecasting.

 

The curriculum will also address data governance and the responsible use of emerging technologies, reflecting the UAE Government’s wider push to expand AI adoption across government.

Who Signed the Agreement — and What Did They Say?

The agreement was signed by Younis Haji AlKhoori, Undersecretary at the UAE Ministry of Finance, and Arif Amiri, CEO of DIFC Authority.

 

AlKhoori positioned the partnership as part of the UAE’s investment in national financial talent and a more efficient, innovation-driven public financial system.

 

Amiri focused on the wider impact: stronger financial capabilities can support the UAE’s financial-services sector, economic diversification and long-term global competitiveness.

 

Together, their comments point to a clear direction — financial leadership in the UAE is being developed around strategy, technology and stronger decision-making.

What Does This Mean for UAE Federal Entities and Finance Professionals?

The partnership signals a higher professional bar for financial leadership across UAE federal entities. Finance roles are increasingly expected to combine technical knowledge with strategic thinking, advisory capability and practical use of technology.

 

The impact may extend beyond government. Businesses working with federal entities are likely to face counterparts with stronger expectations around financial analysis, reporting and decision-making. For private-sector finance teams, that is another reason to strengthen internal capability rather than treat finance as a purely reporting function.

Key Facts at a Glance

Field Confirmed detail
Programmes Certified Chief Finance Director; Certified Financial Consultant
Signed by Younis Haji AlKhoori and Arif Amiri
Date 18 August 2026, Dubai
Core pillars Leadership, AI, strategic finance, financial advisory
Delivery In-person, online and hybrid
Eligibility / fees / intake Not yet announced

ADEPTS’ Advisory Perspective

For businesses, the wider message is straightforward: finance teams are being asked to do more than close books and produce reports.

 

They need to interpret data, support management decisions, use technology effectively and communicate financial implications clearly. This is also where stronger CFO and financial advisory capabilities and a well-designed finance function become increasingly relevant.

 

The MoF–DIFC Academy initiative is therefore worth watching not only as a government training programme, but as an indication of how financial leadership expectations in the UAE are evolving.

Conclusion

The partnership brings four priorities together: leadership, artificial intelligence, strategic financial analysis and advisory capability.

 

More programme details are still to come. But the direction is already clear: the UAE is investing in financial professionals who can combine sound finance fundamentals with technology and better strategic judgement.

 

For federal entities — and the businesses that work with them — that shift is likely to matter well beyond the classroom.

References

Related Articles​​

Coinbase Just Made Abu Dhabi Its Global Tokenization Base — And That Says More About the UAE Than About Coinbase

You have probably seen the Coinbase–Abu Dhabi headline already. The question now is not what Coinbase announced. It is what this changes for businesses, investors and fund managers in the UAE.

 

Here is the short answer: Coinbase has received Financial Services Permission from ADGM’s Financial Services Regulatory Authority (FSRA) to arrange deals in investments and provide custody for tokenized securities. 

 

The permission creates a regulated route for this activity; it is not automatic approval for every tokenized product Coinbase may launch.

 

That distinction is easy to miss. It is also where the story becomes more interesting. The licence, ADGM’s regulatory structure and the first Apple-linked issuance together show how Abu Dhabi intends to turn tokenization from an experiment into financial infrastructure.

Abu Dhabi handed Coinbase something no other financial centre has managed to hand anyone

The 11 August permission is narrow by design: arranging investment deals and custody. It does not give Coinbase an open-ended right to issue any tokenized security it chooses.

 

Under ADGM’s official digital-assets framework, a digital token with the characteristics of a security is regulated as a security. In Coinbase’s model, the tokens are backed by underlying shares. Eligible holders can receive the associated economic rights, including dividends, while voting rights depend on the terms of each prospectus.

 

Coinbase’s pitch is simpler: an investor could access these instruments through a wallet rather than the usual brokerage and correspondent-banking chain.

 

But on-chain does not mean outside compliance. ADGM’s framework still addresses financial crime, custody, market integrity and investor protection, while transfers remain subject to sanctions controls.

 

That is the important development for tokenization UAE: blockchain is being brought inside regulated capital markets rather than being allowed to operate beside them.

Why ADGM won this, when Coinbase could have picked anywhere

This did not start in 2026. The FSRA introduced its crypto-asset regulatory framework in June 2018, covering exchanges, custodians and other intermediaries. Eight years later, that head start matters.

 

ADGM also offers something technology alone cannot provide. The ADGM free zone directly applies English common law, has its own Registration Authority and independent ADGM Courts. Its Listing Authority is built around transparent markets and investor confidence.

 

Brett Tejpaul’s argument goes to the remaining gap: tokenized equities need to remain regulated securities while also operating as blockchain-native assets capable of interacting with on-chain finance.

 

ADGM’s Chief Market Development Officer Arvind Ramamurthy has similarly described its framework as supporting “responsible innovation across custody, trading, and tokenisation.”

 

In our view, that is why the Coinbase decision matters. The UAE is no longer competing simply on regulatory flexibility or on where someone can obtain a crypto license UAE. It is offering a regulatory product: law, licensing, custody, market oversight and enforcement designed to work together.

The Apple certificate is the template, and it tells you what comes next

The Apple CB Certificate turns that regulatory theory into a structure.

 

Coinbase Onchain SPV Ltd, an ADGM special purpose vehicle incorporated in June 2026, is issuing certificates representing beneficial interests in Apple common stock under an FSRA-approved prospectus.

 

The architecture is simple: SPV + prospectus + custody.

 

That matters because it is repeatable. Once the legal and regulatory route has been established, the underlying equity can change without rebuilding the entire structure from zero.

 

The ADGM SPV is therefore relevant beyond Coinbase. UAE investors and businesses already use SPVs for holding companies, real estate, funds and family investments. Tokenization introduces another potential application.

 

For anyone considering an SPV Abu Dhabi structure, the Apple certificate is worth watching for one reason: it gives us an early view of how regulated tokenized ownership may actually be built.

 

And equities may only be the first asset class to test that model.

What actually opens up for UAE businesses over the next 12 months

The opportunity is not to put every asset on-chain. It is to use regulated tokenization where it can improve capital access, ownership or distribution. The global real world asset tokenization market is already above $30 billion, while only about $2.47 billion was active in DeFi in May 2026 — showing how far regulated issuance still sits from open on-chain use.

Area Possible today What could develop next
Private companies Traditional equity/SPVs Tokenized capital raising
Real estate Funds and fractional structures Wider digital distribution
Private credit Loans and private funds Tokenized issuance and settlement
Family offices Direct/fund investments Smaller fractional exposures
Fund managers Conventional distribution Wallet-based distribution

A second opportunity sits underneath these assets: custody, KYC, sanctions controls, accounting and reporting technology.

 

In our view, private credit, fund distribution and supporting compliance services are the most realistic near-term opportunities. Tokenized real estate Dubai structures may follow. Fully permissionless trading of tokenized equities is more likely to take longer.

The tax question none of the headlines are asking

Tokenization does not create a separate UAE tax regime. VAT and Corporate Tax follow the underlying asset, transaction and service. This matters because the FTA expressly excludes financial securities from its virtual-asset definition. Coinbase’s tokenized shares therefore cannot simply be given the same VAT treatment as cryptocurrency.

 

Cabinet Decision No. 100 of 2024 and FTA Public Clarification VATP040 exempt transfers and conversions of qualifying virtual assets retrospectively from 1 January 2018. Fee-based custody, management, platform, advisory or structuring services require separate analysis. “Regulated” does not mean “VAT-free”.

 

The FTA has also published Directive on Tax Transactions No. 3 of 2026, prescribing how digital-currency consideration is converted into AED for VAT reporting.

 

Corporate Tax is separate again. The standard rate is 9% above AED 375,000, while an ADGM entity receives 0% only on qualifying income if the Qualifying Free Zone Person conditions are met. The FTA’s Free Zone guidance confirms that the free-zone location alone is not enough.

 

Accounting also follows substance: cryptocurrencies may fall within IAS 38, while tokenized securities may fall within financial-instrument standards depending on the rights involved. We explain the VAT distinction further in our guide to tokenized assets, digital securities and UAE VAT.

CARF lands in 2027, and this hub is what makes that date real

The UAE Ministry of Finance has signed the CARF Multilateral Competent Authority Agreement. UAE implementation begins in 2027, with the first automatic exchanges expected in 2028.

 

CARF brings transaction reporting and customer due diligence into international tax transparency. Exchanges, brokers and other in-scope crypto-asset service providers may need to identify users and their tax residence and report relevant exchanges and transfers. 

 

Depending on structure, the framework can reach more than conventional cryptocurrency; the OECD specifically recognises crypto-form securities, staking-related transfers and certain decentralised services within the wider framework.

 

That means CARF UAE readiness is not simply an IT exercise. It is a governance and data problem: who owns the information, how tax residence is validated, and whether transaction data can actually be reported.

 

The hub opens in 2026. Reporting starts in 2027. Those systems need to be designed now. Our UAE Corporate Tax, VAT and CARF guide covers the wider compliance position.

Our read: what we think happens next

The next 12 months should show whether Abu Dhabi has created a genuine market or simply a strong first structure.

 

Our first expectation is a response from DIFC. We would expect the DFSA to further develop its approach to tokenized securities as competition between the UAE’s financial centres moves deeper into digital capital markets.

 

ADGM should also attract more issuers. Private credit and investment funds are likely to move before mass-market equities because the commercial case is easier to establish and the investor base is more controlled.

 

Banks and institutional custodians will be the next important piece. If at least one major UAE bank announces a meaningful tokenized-securities custody or settlement partnership within the next year, that would materially strengthen the market.

 

Tax guidance should evolve as well. With CARF implementation approaching in 2027, we expect more UAE guidance around the reporting and tax treatment of digital assets and tokenized structures.

 

There are reasons to remain cautious. Liquidity is still uncertain, integration with traditional markets takes time, and regulatory approval does not guarantee investor demand. The technology may move faster than the market around it.

What we would tell a client sitting in this space today

For businesses already active in digital assets, the priority should be getting the existing structure ready before adding another product. That means reviewing VAT treatment, making sure CARF data can actually be captured, and settling the IFRS accounting position before it becomes an audit issue.

 

Businesses considering ADGM company formation should look beyond incorporation. Substance, tax status, banking, regulatory permissions and reporting obligations need to work together. ADGM registration is only one step in that process.

 

For businesses still watching, there is no need to move simply because Coinbase has. The better approach is to identify the trigger that would justify action: clearer regulation, proven liquidity, a relevant asset-class launch or a commercially viable use case.

 

In our experience, setting up the entity is usually the easier part. Aligning the legal structure with tax, accounting and compliance requirements is where most of the real work begins.

How ADEPTS works with businesses on this

ADEPTS supports businesses assessing ADGM SPV and holding-company structures, including Corporate Tax and QFZP assessments, VAT reviews, IFRS classification, audit readiness and CARF reporting preparation.

 

The objective is not simply to establish an entity. It is to determine whether the proposed structure works from a regulatory, tax and financial-reporting perspective before commitments are made.

FAQs

No. The permission covers specified regulated activities. Individual products may still require separate regulatory approvals and prospectus requirements.

Not automatically. Economic and voting rights depend on the structure of the certificate and the terms of the relevant prospectus.

Not automatically. The FTA excludes financial securities from the virtual-asset definition, so the VAT treatment depends on the underlying instrument and the service being supplied.

No. The 0% rate applies only to Qualifying Income where the entity meets the Qualifying Free Zone Person conditions.

In-scope businesses need systems capable of identifying reportable customers, tax residence and relevant crypto-asset transactions before reporting begins.

Potentially, yes. But establishing an SPV does not itself authorise regulated tokenization activity. The intended activities and required permissions must be assessed separately.

References

Related Articles​​

UAE Sets AED 1/mL Minimum Excise Price on Vape Liquids

The UAE Ministry of Finance has set a minimum Excise Price of AED 1 per millilitre for liquids used in electronic smoking devices and tools, starting from 1 September 2026. The change affects the value used to calculate Excise Tax on these products. It does not alter the existing 100% Excise Tax rate on e-liquids.

 

Businesses dealing in these products should now review their e-liquid ranges ahead of the effective date. This includes checking the volume recorded for each SKU and identifying any products where the current Excise Price is below the new AED 1 per mL minimum.

What Is the UAE's New Minimum Excise Price for Vape Liquids?

From 1 September 2026, vape liquids used in electronic smoking devices and tools will carry a minimum Excise Price of AED 1 per mL. The official WAM announcement confirms both the new threshold and the date from which it will apply.

 

For example, the minimum Excise Price would be AED 30 for a 30 mL bottle and AED 60 for a 60 mL bottle. This is a minimum value for Excise Tax purposes, not a new tax rate.

 

The Federal Tax Authority’s January 2026 Taxable Persons Guide continues to show e-liquids as subject to Excise Tax at 100%. That rate has applied since 1 December 2019. What changes in September is the minimum Excise Price used in the calculation.

 

Businesses with affected products should consider reviewing their current pricing and product records before the new threshold takes effect. An Excise Tax Health Check can help identify products that may require closer review.

What Exactly Did the Ministry of Finance Decide?

The Ministry of Finance announced the new measure on 6 August 2026. From 1 September 2026, liquids used in electronic smoking devices and tools will be subject to a minimum Excise Price of AED 1 per mL.

 

According to the Ministry, the change is intended to reflect developments in the excise goods market and improve consistency in the way Excise Tax rules are applied across tobacco and electronic smoking products. It is also aimed at supporting compliance and reducing practices that could weaken the effective application of the tax.

 

The measure sits within the UAE’s existing Excise Tax framework. This includes Federal Decree-Law No. 7 of 2017 on Excise Tax, as amended, and Cabinet Decision No. 197 of 2025, which sets out the relevant excise goods, applicable tax rates and the rules for determining the Excise Price.

 

Cabinet Decision No. 197 of 2025 has applied since 1 January 2026. It also repealed Cabinet Decision No. 52 of 2019 under Article 14, with Article 15 confirming its effective date.

 

One point remains important for reporting purposes. As of 7 August 2026, the public announcement does not identify the new minimum-price measure by a decision number. Until an official number is published, it is more accurate to refer to it simply as “the Decision”.

How Is a Minimum Excise Price Different From a Retail Price?

A minimum Excise Price is not the same as a minimum retail price.

 

The minimum Excise Price is the floor used for Excise Tax purposes. A retail price, by comparison, is the commercial price charged to the customer. The new measure therefore should not be described as a requirement for retailers to sell vape liquids at no less than AED 1 per mL.

 

The National illustrated the distinction using a 60 mL bottle priced at AED 40. Under the new minimum, the product would be taxed as if its price were AED 60 because the applicable minimum Excise Price is AED 1 for every millilitre. Read The National’s coverage of the announcement.

 

This distinction matters because a business’s commercial selling price and the Excise Price relevant for tax purposes may not be the same. Pricing, tax coding and product records should therefore be reviewed separately rather than treating AED 1 per mL as a mandatory shelf price.

 

Businesses reviewing historic or current Excise Tax treatment can also consider a more detailed Excise Tax Audit.

Which Products Are Covered — and Which Stay Unchanged?

The new floor applies specifically to liquids used in electronic smoking devices and tools.

 

Article 4 of Cabinet Decision No. 197 of 2025 defines this category broadly to include liquids used in such devices and similar products whether or not they contain nicotine, subject to the applicable Customs codes.

 

This means the measure is not limited only to nicotine-containing vape liquids.

 

The 6 August announcement does not extend the AED 1 per mL minimum to electronic smoking devices, coils, hardware or accessories. The Decision as announced specifically introduces the new minimum for liquids, so the AED 1 per mL floor should not be extended to other products without an applicable legal basis or further official guidance.

 

The position announced by the Ministry can be summarised as follows:

Product category Minimum Excise Price Status
One cigarette AED 0.40 Unchanged
Water pipe tobacco, ready-to-use tobacco and similar products AED 0.10 per gram Unchanged
Liquids used in electronic smoking devices and tools AED 1.00 per mL New — from 1 September 2026

The existing tobacco minimums originate from Cabinet Decision No. 55 of 2019. The FTA’s current guidance confirms a minimum Excise Price of AED 0.40 for each cigarette and AED 0.10 for each gram of water pipe tobacco, ready-to-use tobacco or similar products.

 

E-liquids, meanwhile, continue to carry the existing 100% Excise Tax rate. Cabinet Decision No. 197 of 2025 expressly sets the rate for liquids used in electronic smoking devices and tools at 100%.

 

The September measure therefore adds a minimum Excise Price for these liquids without changing the underlying rate.

Why Is the UAE Introducing This Change Now?

The Ministry of Finance has linked the Decision to developments in the excise goods market and to the consistent application of unified standards across tobacco and electronic smoking products.

 

It also stated that the measure supports tax compliance and is intended to limit practices that may affect the effective implementation of Excise Tax.

 

The announcement does not indicate a future rate increase or a wider extension of the AED 1 per mL floor to other electronic smoking products. Businesses should therefore distinguish the published measure from assumptions about future policy changes.

What Does This Mean for Vape Businesses and Importers?

Businesses dealing with e-liquids may wish to complete a focused review before 1 September 2026.

 

Relevant review areas include:

  • identifying every SKU containing liquids used in electronic smoking devices and confirming the volume recorded in millilitres;

  • comparing current declared Excise Prices with the AED 1 per mL minimum;

  • reviewing pricing and margin models where lower-priced products may be affected;

  • checking that product, import and Customs documentation records e-liquid volumes consistently;

  • reviewing commercial agreements where Excise Tax costs are passed through to distributors or customers; and

  • checking product registration and Excise Tax records maintained through the relevant FTA systems.

These are practical review areas rather than additional procedural obligations specifically stated in the Ministry’s 6 August announcement.

 

The announcement does not set out detailed transitional treatment for stock already held in the UAE on 1 September 2026. It also does not prescribe a specific re-declaration process for existing products whose Excise Price is below the new floor. Businesses should therefore avoid assuming a particular transitional treatment until further guidance is issued by the Ministry of Finance or the Federal Tax Authority.

 

The FTA’s current guide confirms that Excise Tax can arise when Excise Goods are imported, produced, stockpiled or released for consumption in the UAE. It also identifies persons releasing Excise Goods from a Designated Zone among those potentially required to account for the tax.

 

The precise impact of the new minimum should therefore be considered by reference to the taxpayer’s role and the relevant tax point.

 

Businesses seeking a broader readiness assessment may consider an Excise Tax Health Check. Where technical clarification or representation before the Authority is required, support may also be obtained through FTA-approved Tax Agency Services.

How ADEPTS Can Help

ADEPTS can assist businesses affected by the new minimum Excise Price in reviewing their e-liquid portfolios before 1 September 2026.

 

The review can cover current Excise Prices against the AED 1 per mL floor, SKU volumes and product classifications, supporting records and areas requiring further clarification. Where appropriate, businesses can undertake an Excise Tax Health Check or a more detailed Excise Tax Audit to identify potential compliance gaps.

 

ADEPTS can also support businesses in reviewing their wider UAE taxation position and, where an issue remains unclear, assist with appropriate engagement with the Federal Tax Authority through its Tax Agency Services.

Conclusion

From 1 September 2026, liquids used in electronic smoking devices and tools will be subject to a minimum Excise Price of AED 1 per mL. The measure does not change the existing 100% Excise Tax rate on e-liquids, and the existing minimum Excise Prices for cigarettes and covered tobacco products remain unchanged.

 

For affected importers, producers and other Excise Tax registrants, the key task before implementation is to identify products that may fall below the new floor and review the underlying product and pricing data.

 

Any transitional, stock-specific or Designated Zone issues not addressed in the announcement should be assessed against subsequent Ministry of Finance or FTA guidance rather than assumed in advance.

References

Related Articles​​

DIFC Prescribed Company Regulations 2026: SPV Regime Now Open to Everyone — But There’s a Catch

On 24 July 2026, the eligibility gate restricting access to DIFC Prescribed Companies since 2019 was removed. The DIFC Prescribed Company Regulations 2026 opened the regime to more investors and holding structures.

 

But the filter did not disappear, it moved. For most applicants, access now depends on appointing a Corporate Services Provider to handle filings, records and dealings with the Registrar.

What Actually Changed on 24 July 2026

Under the 2024 rules, the DIFC prescribed company requirements were built around eligibility. A vehicle generally had to be controlled by a GCC Person, a DIFC Registered Person or a DFSA Authorised Firm. Alternatively, it could enter through a GCC Registrable Asset, one of five Qualifying Purposes, or the 2024 route involving a director employed by an approved Corporate Services Provider.

 

Those entry tests have now been removed. Applicants no longer need to demonstrate a particular nationality, domicile, asset location or pre-existing connection with the GCC. The five Qualifying Purposes: Aviation Structure, Crowdfunding Structure, Intellectual Property Structure, Maritime Structure and Structured Financing, also no longer determine whether an applicant may establish a Prescribed Company.

 

Access is broader, but administration is more controlled. Unless the company qualifies as an Exempt PC, it must appoint a Corporate Services Provider. The CSP is responsible for submitting filings and fees, maintaining accessible copies of statutory records and acting as the company’s principal interface with the DIFC Registrar of Companies. This is no longer an optional support arrangement, it is a statutory part of the regime.

 

The permitted holding scope has also been clarified. A Prescribed Company may hold assets for a Crowdfunding Structure, a Fund or a Family Office providing Family Office Services, subject to the applicable DFSA framework. However, it cannot itself act as a fund manager, trustee, general partner or regulated financial services provider unless properly authorised.

 

One restriction has become wider. The previous prohibition on employing staff now extends expressly to “any other form of workers”. The company must therefore remain a passive holding vehicle rather than becoming a lightly regulated operating business.

 

The eligibility filter did not vanish, it moved.

Requirement PC Regulations 2024 PC Regulations 2026
Qualifying Applicant test Required Removed
Qualifying Purpose – Aviation, Crowdfunding, Intellectual Property, Maritime or Structured Financing Required if not a qualifying applicant Removed
GCC nexus / GCC Registrable Asset One accepted route in No longer relevant to eligibility
Corporate Services Provider Practical necessity, not mandatory Mandatory unless Exempt PC
Employ staff Prohibited Prohibited – scope widened
Passive holding only Yes Yes – unchanged
Use with Financial Services Restricted Permitted if DFSA-compliant

Who Still Does Not Need a Corporate Services Provider?

The exemption depends on who controls the company, not on the assets it holds. Your DIFC holding company 2026 may qualify as an exempt prescribed company DIFC where its Controller falls within one of these four categories:

  1. DIFC Registered Person: A DIFC-registered entity may qualify, but the definition excludes a Prescribed Variable Capital Company, a Foundation, a Non-Profit Incorporated Organisation and another Prescribed Company.

  2. DFSA Authorised Firm: A firm authorised to conduct financial services under the applicable regulatory framework.

  3. Government Entity: This includes the UAE federal or emirate governments, governments of recognised jurisdictions, entities they control and entities in which a qualifying government holds, directly or indirectly at least 25%.

  4. Publicly Listed Entity: A body corporate with any class of securities listed on an exchange in a recognised jurisdiction.

Where none of these categories applies, appointing a DIFC corporate services provider is mandatory. The CSP becomes the company’s formal administrative and compliance interface with the Registrar of Companies.

 

Exempt does not mean unregulated. The company remains subject to its filing, record-keeping and governance obligations. An Exempt PC may also appoint a CSP voluntarily, and many will retain one to manage ongoing compliance.

Already Have a DIFC Prescribed Company? Your Clock Started on 24 July

Existing Prescribed Companies are not automatically protected by their incorporation date. Where a company does not qualify as an Exempt PC, it has six months from 24 July 2026 to appoint a Corporate Services Provider. That places the practical deadline on 24 January 2027.

Item Detail
Enactment date 24 July 2026
Transition window Six months
Practical deadline 24 January 2027
No CSP appointed Fine of up to USD 20,000
Records not given to CSP Fine of up to USD 100,000
Worst case Loss of PC status and application of standard DIFC company requirements

The fines are significant, but revocation is the larger commercial risk. A non-compliant entity can cease to be treated as a Prescribed Company, lose the related fee concessions and become subject to the wider requirements applicable under DIFC legislation. This may bring standard licensing, premises and operational obligations into scope.

 

Existing owners should now take four practical steps:

  1. Confirm whether the company is exempt or non-exempt.
  2. Shortlist a DFSA-registered Corporate Services Provider operating in the DIFC.
  3. Assemble the statutory records and supporting information required for the CSP handover.
  4. Diarise all licence renewal, filing and confirmation-statement deadlines.

A failure to appoint the CSP may attract a fine of up to USD 20,000. Withholding the records needed by the CSP carries a substantially higher maximum fine of USD 100,000.

 

The transition period is workable, but only for companies that start before the deadline becomes a compliance problem.

What This Means for Family Offices, Funds and Foreign Investors

For family groups, the removal of the GCC nexus creates a more direct route into DIFC. A family without existing GCC assets or ownership connections can now use a Prescribed Company for an appropriate holding structure, subject to the revised DIFC prescribed company requirements. The timing is significant: DIFC reported 1,409 foundations in H1 2026, up 67% year on year, while family business-related entities increased to 1,408.

 

Funds and Crowdfunding Structures now sit expressly within the permitted holding scope. This supports cleaner asset ownership and ring-fencing, although the Prescribed Company cannot itself conduct regulated financial services without complying with the DFSA framework.

 

For foreign investors, the former eligibility barrier is also gone. A UK, Indian or European investor holding Dubai real estate, group shares or other investments no longer needs to establish a qualifying GCC connection. Unless exempt, the practical entry condition is appointing a DIFC Corporate Services Provider.

 

A Prescribed Company is not automatically tax-free. Under the UAE Corporate Tax framework, the standard 9% rate applies to taxable income above AED 375,000, while qualifying free-zone treatment depends on satisfying the statutory conditions. Dividends and qualifying share gains may benefit from the participation exemption, while treaty access remains subject to the relevant agreement, tax residency and supporting substance.

 

Government fees remain comparatively low, but CSP fees are now a recurring cost for non-exempt vehicles.

What Did Not Change

  • It remains a passive vehicle. A Prescribed Company may hold and control assets, but it cannot conduct trading or day-to-day operational activities. See the DIFC Legal Database.

  • It still cannot employ staff. The restriction now also covers other forms of workers. Directors and independent third-party service providers may continue to support the company.

  • It does not receive automatic DFSA authorisation. A Prescribed Company may be used in connection with Financial Services only where the structure complies with DFSA-administered legislation.

  • AML and ownership transparency obligations remain. The company must continue meeting applicable AML/CFT and Ultimate Beneficial Owner requirements.

  • The legal framework remains a core advantage. DIFC continues to provide an English-language, common-law system supported by the DIFC Courts.

How ADEPTS Can Help

Determining whether your company is exempt, and meeting the six-month transition deadline, requires an early, documented assessment.

 

ADEPTS supports clients with:

  • Exemption assessments against the four Controller categories
  • Incorporation under the 2026 Prescribed Company regime
  • CSP selection, onboarding and compliance coordination
  • Records and filing readiness for the Registrar of Companies
  • UAE Corporate Tax and participation-exemption structuring reviews
  • Transition management for existing Prescribed Companies

Our advice is informed by the DIFC’s growth to 10,018 active companies in H1 2026 and alternative structures, including VCC ring-fencing, the DIFC VCC Regulations 2026, ADGM versus DIFC holding structures and ADGM holding companies.

 

ADEPTS delivers a compliant structure, a controlled transition and a defensible tax position.

Conclusion

The eligibility wall has gone, making DIFC Prescribed Companies accessible to a much wider pool of investors. But access now comes with a different control point: for most applicants, appointing a Corporate Services Provider is a legal requirement, supported by meaningful penalties.

 

For existing non-exempt Prescribed Companies, the transition period is already running and should not be treated as an administrative formality.

 

ADEPTS provides a free DIFC Prescribed Company exemption and transition assessment to help you confirm your position, identify the required actions and meet the deadline with a clear compliance plan.

References

Related Articles​​

DFM H1 2026 Results: AED 443.2 Million Profit as Trading Surges 40.4%

AED 443.2 million is the headline figure. But the bigger story is the amount of money that moved through the market.

 

Investors traded AED 119.5 billion on Dubai Financial Market during the first half of 2026. That was 40.4% more than a year earlier.

 

The official DFM H1 2026 financial results show lower reported profit, but much stronger trading activity, liquidity and investor participation. The results were announced on 30 July 2026 for the six months ended 30 June 2026.

What Are DFM’s H1 2026 Financial Results?

DFM reported AED 443.2 million in net profit before tax for H1 2026. Total consolidated revenue reached AED 557 million. Expenses excluding tax stood at AED 113.8 million. Revenue and profit were lower than in H1 2025, mainly because the earlier period included significant one-off income. Expenses increased slightly from AED 111.8 million.

 

Revenue included:

  • AED 384.8 million in operating income
  • AED 172.2 million from investment returns and other income

The breakdown matters. It helps investors separate normal operating income from investment-related earnings. It also shows why clear financial reporting and IFRS support is important.

How Did DFM Post AED 443.2 Million in Profit Despite Lower Revenue?

The fall in reported revenue and profit mainly relates to the comparison period. H1 2025 included AED 462.2 million from the sale of an investment property. This was a one-time gain. Without it, DFM’s underlying H1 2026 performance appears stronger.

Metric H1 2026 H1 2025 Q2 2026 Q2 2025
Total consolidated revenue AED 557m AED 888.9m AED 303.9m AED 702.5m
Net profit before tax AED 443.2m AED 777.1m AED 249.9m AED 642.2m
Expenses excluding tax AED 113.8m AED 111.8m Not stated Not stated

The one-off property-sale income increased both revenue and profit in H1 2025. The reported year-on-year decline therefore does not provide a direct like-for-like comparison of DFM’s recurring performance.

 

The lower DFM net profit 2026 comparison therefore does not mean the exchange’s main operations weakened.

What Is Driving DFM’s 40.4% Jump in Trading Activity?

More money was traded. Investors also completed more transactions each day. Total Dubai Financial Market trading activity reached AED 119.5 billion, compared with AED 85.1 billion in H1 2025. This happened despite the market having fewer trading days.

 

Average daily traded value increased by 45.1% to AED 1.004 billion.

 

That was around 45% above the AED 692 million average recorded for full-year 2025. The 2025 figure was already DFM’s highest liquidity level in more than a decade.

 

Total trades rose by 31% to 2.23 million. Average daily trades increased by 35.4% to around 18,759.

 

DFM recorded this activity over 119 trading days, compared with 123 days in H1 2025. More trading took place in less time.

 

For listed companies, higher trading volumes can provide more market data for valuation analysis.

Who Is Trading on DFM?

DFM added 42,864 new investors during H1 2026. International investors represented 71.4% of new registrations. However, institutional investors still accounted for most of the value traded on the exchange.

Investor measure H1 2026 H1 2025
Institutional share of traded value 71.2% 70.8%
Foreign share of trading activity 51%
Foreign ownership of market value 20.06% 20.04%
Institutional ownership 86.5%

The DFM investor participation data tells two stories:

  1. New registrations show wider international interest. 
  2. The trading figures show that institutions still provide most of the market’s liquidity.

DFM H1 2026 vs H1 2025: Key Numbers at a Glance

The comparison shows a clear difference between profitability, liquidity and valuation. Reported profit fell because of the one-time 2025 gain. Trading activity increased sharply. However, total market value ended slightly lower.

Metric H1 2026 H1 2025
Revenue AED 557 million AED 888.9 million
Profit before tax AED 443.2 million AED 777.1 million
Expenses excluding tax AED 113.8 million AED 111.8 million
Total traded value AED 119.5 billion AED 85.1 billion
Average daily traded value AED 1.004 billion AED 692 million
Trading days 119 123
Market capitalisation AED 981.6 billion AED 995.6 billion
DFM General Index close 5,955.58 points Not stated

DFM market capitalization declined by 1.4% year on year.

 

This means investors traded more often, even though the combined value of listed companies ended the period slightly lower.

What Does This Mean for Dubai’s Capital Markets?

The results suggest that DFM is becoming a deeper and more internationally connected market, not simply a busier one.

 

DFM Chairman Helal Saeed Al Marri linked the performance to sustained investor engagement, Dubai’s economic fundamentals and continued international interest. Hamed Ali, CEO of DFM and Nasdaq Dubai, highlighted sustained liquidity, a diverse investor mix and confidence in the efficiency of DFM’s market infrastructure. He also said DFM would continue to strengthen its infrastructure and widen investment opportunities.

 

These factors matter because the strength of a capital market is not measured only by market capitalisation or index movements. Liquidity, investor diversity and the ability to attract long-term capital are equally important.

 

DFM’s H1 2026 performance therefore supports the direction of the official Dubai Economic Agenda D33. The agenda aims to double Dubai’s economy over ten years and strengthen the city’s position as a leading global business and financial centre

ADEPTS’ Perspective: Why This Matters for UAE Businesses and Investors

The rise in institutional and foreign investment is a positive sign for Dubai’s capital markets. It also raises the level of information expected from companies seeking investment, preparing for an IPO or entering a major transaction.

 

Investors usually look closely at financial statements, valuation assumptions and the documents supporting significant transactions. Weak reporting or incomplete records can delay a deal and reduce confidence.

 

Businesses planning to raise capital should therefore review their audit readiness, financial reporting and valuation approach at an early stage. Financial due diligence can also help identify issues before they are raised by investors, lenders or regulators.

 

ADEPTS supports UAE businesses through deal advisory, M&A support, business valuation services and CFO services. As DIFC-approved auditor, the firm helps businesses improve the quality of their financial information and prepare for investment or transaction review.

Conclusion

DFM’s H1 2026 results present a clear picture.

 

Reported profit before tax was lower mainly because H1 2025 included one-off income from the sale of an investment property. At the same time, traded value, transaction volumes and average daily activity increased strongly.

 

Foreign and institutional investors continued to play a major role in DFM’s liquidity. New international registrations also show that the market is attracting a wider investor base.

 

The second half of 2026 will show whether this momentum can be maintained. If it continues, DFM will be well placed to support Dubai’s wider capital-market ambitions under the Dubai Economic Agenda D33.

 

For businesses seeking investment, preparing for an IPO or entering a major transaction, stronger financial reporting, reliable valuations and complete transaction records will remain essential. ADEPTS supports companies in preparing for these requirements as the UAE capital market continues to develop.

References

Related Articles​​

DIFC Free Zone Crosses 10,000 Companies in H1 2026: What the Record Half-Year Means for Your Business, Tax and Compliance

The DIFC free zone crossed 10,000 active companies. This is a success with a ripple effect stretching over multiple aspects of the economy. 

 

That is not a small milestone. It signals the increased global confidence in Dubai as a financial hub.  It also means more capital and more competition with a lot more scrutiny now. This success aligns DIFC performance with the D33 agenda as well as the government’s aspirations of making UAE one of the biggest financial hubs of the world in coming years. 

 

This piece breaks down the numbers, the tax rules that actually apply, and whether DIFC is even the right base for you.

 

Key numbers at a glance:

  • 10,018 active registered companies at the end of H1 2026. This is up 30% in 12 months, with 2,318 new firms added

  • Regulated financial firms: 1,134 (+16%). AI, FinTech and innovation firms: 1,933 (+39%)

  • Foundations: 1,409 (+67%). Family-related entities: 1,408 (+36%)

  • A DIFC license does NOT automatically mean 0% corporate tax – Qualifying Free Zone Person (QFZP) conditions apply

  • DIFC’s filing and audit deadlines are tighter than most other UAE free zones

What Did DIFC Actually Announce for H1 2026?

Is DIFC a free zone? Yes, it is the region’s leading financial free zone, regulated by the Dubai Financial Services Authority (DFSA), with 10,018 active registered companies as of H1 2026 and its own common-law courts.

 

According to DIFC’s H1 2026 announcement, active registered companies reached 10,018 by 30 June 2026, up 30% organically over the past 12 months after 2,318 new firms joined. That is a sharp acceleration. Q1 2026 alone brought 775 new companies, a 62% year-on-year jump, on top of the 8,844 companies DIFC closed 2025 with.

 

Regulated financial services firms rose to 1,134 (+16%). AI, FinTech and innovation firms hit 1,933 (+39%), with 361 joining the DIFC Innovation Hub in H1 alone. Family-related entities climbed to 1,408 (+36%), and foundations to 1,409 (+67%). Dubai also climbed to 7th place on the Global Financial Centres Index – its highest-ever ranking, and a direct marker on the road to the Dubai Economic Agenda (D33) goal of a top-four global financial centre by 2033.

Metric H1 2026 Figure YoY Change
Active registered companies 10,018 +30%
New companies added 2,318
Regulated financial firms 1,134 +16%
AI, FinTech and innovation firms 1,933 +39%
Family-related entities 1,408 +36%
Foundations 1,409 +67%

Which Sectors Drove the Growth and What Does That Signal for Your Business?

Which sectors grew the most in DIFC in H1 2026? Banking and capital markets, insurance and reinsurance, and wealth and asset management all expanded together – this is a breadth story, not a single-sector spike.

 

DIFC now hosts 327 banking and capital markets firms, 165 insurance and reinsurance companies, and 592 wealth and asset management firms. Insurance gross written premiums hit $4.2 billion in 2025, keeping DIFC the region’s largest re/insurance hub. Names like JP Morgan International Advisors, Citadel, Bank of Canada, Allianz Trade Middle East, CapitaLand Investment, Sun Life and ICICI Prudential Asset Management all set up regional operations here since H1 2025.

 

These new businesses are actually their operating bases. That means more DFSA-regulated headcount, tighter office supply, and stronger due diligence expectations on every smaller firm sharing the ecosystem.

Why Are Family Offices and Foundations Moving Into DIFC So Fast?

What is a DIFC Foundation? It is a separate legal entity with no shareholders, governed under DIFC Law No. 3 of 2018 (as amended in 2024)  built for succession planning, asset protection and multi-generation wealth structures.

 

A 67% jump in foundations in one year is the most telling figure in the entire release. It signals capital being anchored, not just registered. DIFC runs this through its Family Wealth Centre, an Expert Advisory Council, and a Next Generation Leadership Programme for succession planning. A Foundation suits pure holding and succession; a Prescribed Company works as a lighter-weight holding vehicle for a single asset or SPV; a standard holding company fits an active group structure.

What Does DIFC's AI-Native Strategy Mean for FinTech Founders?

Is DIFC building an AI-native financial centre? Yes, DIFC is embedding AI across regulation, operations and talent, a shift it projects will generate $3.5 billion (AED 12.9 billion) in economic value and 25,000 jobs.

 

The Innovation Hub added 361 companies in H1 2026 alone, part of the 1,933-strong AI, FinTech and innovation cluster. For founders, the real question is cost: a subsidised DIFC Innovation Licence versus a standard licence, and the exact point your product crosses into DFSA-regulated territory – payments, arranging, advising, or crypto tokens. Attracting AI companies is one thing. Embedding AI across an entire regulatory system is another, execution, not just the announcement, is the real test here.

Do DIFC Companies Pay 9% Corporate Tax in 2026?

Does a DIFC licence mean 0% corporate tax? No. Only a Qualifying Free Zone Person (QFZP) earning Qualifying Income pays 0%. Everything else is taxed at 9%, under Federal Decree-Law No. 47 of 2022.

 

Qualifying Income is defined under Cabinet Decision No. 100 of 2023, and Qualifying/Excluded Activities were rewritten by Ministerial Decision No. 229 of 2025, which replaced Ministerial Decision No. 265 of 2023 and applies retroactively from 1 June 2023.

 

The trap is the de minimis rule: non-qualifying revenue must stay under the lower of AED 5,000,000 or 5% of total revenue, not the higher. Say your DIFC advisory firm earns AED 20 million in total revenue, with AED 1.2 million sourced from mainland non-qualifying work. That’s 6% — above the 5% cap, so QFZP status is lost. And it’s not lost for one quarter. Breach any single condition and 0% disappears for that tax period and the following four tax periods, on all income, not just the offending stream.

 

To keep QFZP status, a Free Zone Person needs: adequate substance in DIFC, genuinely Qualifying Income, no election for standard rates, arm’s-length pricing, and audited financial statements. Non-QFZP entities pay 0% only on the first AED 375,000 of income, 9% above it. 

 

Multinational groups above EUR 750 million also face the 15% Domestic Minimum Top-up Tax under Cabinet Decision No. 142 of 2024, effective 1 January 2025.

What Compliance Comes With a DIFC Licence?

What does a DIFC company need to file each year? Audited financial statements under IFRS, filed with the DIFC Registrar of Companies, using an auditor on the DIFC Registrar of Auditors or a DFSA-registered auditor for regulated firms.

 

DIFC’s filing window is tighter than most UAE free zones, and late filing carries daily penalties, far steeper for DFSA-regulated firms. A small-company audit exemption exists by turnover and shareholder count, but it does not apply to DFSA-regulated entities, and the annual return is still due regardless.

 

Add AML/CFT policies, Economic Substance Regulations assessments, and from 1 July 2026 – UAE e-invoicing onboarding, which applies to DIFC entities as UAE taxable persons. ADEPTS is a DIFC-approved auditor, so this is exactly the ground we work on daily.

Is DIFC the Right Base or Is ADGM or Mainland a Better Fit?

Is DIFC more expensive than ADGM or mainland? Yes, generally, you’re paying for common-law courts, DFSA credibility and a mature financial ecosystem, not just a licence.

DIFC ADGM Mainland
Legal system Common law, DIFC Courts Common law UAE civil law
Regulation DFSA FSRA DED / relevant authority
Best fit Financial services, funds, foundations Asset management, holding structures Retail, trading with the local market
Corporation tax 0% only if QFZP 0% only if QFZP 9% above AED 375,000

DIFC Square (600,000 sq ft) is already fully pre-leased before completion, and the new Zabeel District is being built for 42,000+ companies. Office availability is now part of your DIFC business setup decision, not an afterthought. Ask yourself three things: who are your customers, do you need a regulator, and do you need common-law courts? The answers usually point you to the right zone fast.

How ADEPTS Can Help

Growth is good news. But growth like this also means more competition for QFZP conditions to slip, and less room for filing errors. That’s where ADEPTS comes in.

  • QFZP position reviews before year-end, not after the tax return is filed

  • Audit readiness and DIFC Registrar filing, from a DIFC-approved auditor

  • Foundation and holding structure design, working alongside our legal team

  • FTA-registered tax agent support for corporate tax filing and disputes

With ADEPTS, you don’t just get a DIFC licence. You get a structure that still qualifies for 0% next year, and the year after.

The Bottom Line

The real story behind 10,018 companies isn’t the round number – it’s the breadth of growth across banking, insurance, wealth management and family wealth, all at once. A DIFC license is a credibility asset with a compliance price tag attached. And the 0% rate is earned every year — not handed out at incorporation.

 

DIFC’s next chapter is already shaping up: an AI-native ambition, the Zabeel District’s capacity, and Dubai’s push toward the D33 top-four target. If you’re weighing a DIFC business setup, or already inside one, get your QFZP position checked now.

FAQs:

DIFC reached 10,018 active registered companies at the end of H1 2026, up 30% year-on-year.

No. Only a Qualifying Free Zone Person earning Qualifying Income pays 0%. All other income is taxed at 9%.

It loses the 0% rate for the current tax period and the following four tax periods – on all income, not just the non-qualifying stream.

Yes. Every Free Zone Person, QFZP or not, must register with the Federal Tax Authority and file annual corporate tax returns.

A limited exemption exists by turnover and shareholder count, but it does not apply to DFSA-regulated firms, and the annual return is still due either way.

A Foundation suits pure succession and asset protection with no shareholders. A Prescribed Company is a lighter holding vehicle, often for a single asset or SPV.

Use a firm on the DIFC Registrar of Auditors, or a DFSA-registered auditor if you’re a regulated entity. ADEPTS holds DIFC-approved auditor status.

Cost bands vary widely by activity and whether you’re DFSA-regulated – regulated firms carry materially higher costs once capital and compliance hires are counted. Get an indicative quote before committing.

Both work. DIFC edges ahead for foundations and family wealth infrastructure; ADGM often suits simpler holding structures. The right call depends on your assets and residency.

Only in limited ways, and mainland-sourced revenue counts toward the de minimis test that can cost you QFZP status if it crosses the threshold. Structure this carefully.

References

  • Emirates News Agency (WAM). “DIFC records industry-leading achievements in H1 2026.” 28 July 2026.
    https://www.wam.ae

  • Dubai Media Office. “DIFC records industry-leading achievements in H1 2026, reinforcing its position as the region’s leading global financial centre.” 28 July 2026. https://mediaoffice.ae

  • Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC). H1 2026 performance announcement. https://www.difc.ae

  • UAE Ministry of Finance. Ministerial Decision No. 229 of 2025 on Qualifying Activities and Excluded Activities; Cabinet Decision No. 100 of 2023; Cabinet Decision No. 142 of 2024 on the Domestic Minimum Top-up Tax. https://mof.gov.ae

  • Federal Tax Authority (FTA). Corporate Tax Guide on Free Zone Persons and Qualifying Free Zone Person conditions. https://tax.gov.ae

  • Dubai Financial Services Authority (DFSA). Rulebook — auditor registration and regulated-firm reporting requirements. https://www.dfsa.ae

Related Articles​​

DIFC Courts Reports AED 10.02 Billion in Claims, Record Caseload in H1 2026

Big numbers just came out of the Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC) Courts. AED 10.02 billion in claims. 810 cases. A 48% jump in claim value over last year. That’s a record.

 

And it tells you something important about where businesses are choosing to fight, and settle, their disputes.

What Did the DIFC Courts Report for H1 2026?

The DIFC Courts published their statistics for January to June 2026. This is the first half-year report since the Courts launched their five-year Growth Strategy (2026–2030) in December 2025.

 

810 cases filed across all divisions, a 25% increase year-on-year, with a combined claim value of AED 10.02 billion (USD 2.73 billion). That’s up 48% from H1 2025. That is massive- significant enough to make the news.

 

This isn’t an isolated spike either. It builds directly on Q1 2026, when the Courts recorded 396 cases worth AED 3.5 billion – a 22% year-on-year rise on its own. H2 clearly accelerated the trend. The Courts frame this as an early signal that their strategy is working: more high-value disputes, more voluntary use of the Courts, and continued digital-first delivery.

 

For context, this sits alongside Dubai’s broader push under the Dubai Economic Agenda D33, which aims to double the size of the emirate’s economy by 2033. A commercial court system that businesses trust enough to bring bigger, more complex disputes to is part of that infrastructure.

What Are the Key Numbers Behind the AED 10.02 Billion in Claims?

Let’s get into some important details here. AED 10.02 billion in claims, from 810 cases, averages out to roughly AED 55 million in claims filed every single day of the six-month period. That’s the daily pace of high-value commercial activity landing before the Courts.

Metric H1 2025 H1 2026 % Change
Total cases filed ~648* 810 +25%
Total claim value ~AED 6.77 billion* AED 10.02 billion +48%
Average daily claim value AED 55 million

Compare that to Q1 2026 alone – 396 cases worth AED 3.5 billion and you can see H2 pulled in significantly more value per case. Fewer additional cases, but each one carrying more weight. That’s consistent with the Courts’ own framing: growth is coming from higher-value, more complex disputes, not just higher volume.

Why Are More Businesses Choosing DIFC Courts Through Opt-In Jurisdiction?

Here’s the part that should genuinely interest you if you draft or negotiate commercial contracts in the UAE.

 

Opt-in jurisdiction means a company that isn’t otherwise required to use the DIFC Courts like a mainland company, an offshore entity, a foreign counterparty, can still choose to bring its disputes there. All it takes is a jurisdiction clause in the contract. No DIFC address. No DIFC license. Just an agreement between two parties that this is where they want disputes resolved.

 

In H1 2026, 243 of the 810 cases, nearly one in three, arrived this way. And within the Court of First Instance (CFI) specifically, 42% of claims were opt-in.

 

That’s a meaningful shift. Justice Omar Al Mheiri, Director of the DIFC Courts, described this as “the figures of a jurisdiction chosen, not assigned.” Parties aren’t ending up at the DIFC Courts by accident or by default. They’re picking it deliberately often because they want English common law principles, internationally recognized judges, and a track record of enforceable rulings.

 

If you’re structuring a joint venture, a supply agreement, or any contract with cross-border exposure, the dispute-resolution clause is not boilerplate. It’s a decision with real consequences if things go wrong later.

How Is the DIFC Courts' Arbitration Division Performing in 2026?

The Arbitration Division registered 37 claims in H1 2026, up 61% year-on-year, worth a combined AED 3.17 billion.

 

Worth clarifying what this actually means, because it’s easy to confuse with arbitration itself. The DIFC Courts don’t run arbitrations. Bodies like the DIFC-LCIA (or its successor arrangements) and other arbitral institutions do that. What the Courts’ Arbitration Division handles is the supervisory role, recognizing and enforcing arbitral awards, ruling on jurisdictional challenges, and supporting arbitration-related proceedings.

 

For businesses with cross-border contracts that specify arbitration as the dispute mechanism, this matters. A 61% jump in claims here suggests more parties are actively using DIFC Courts as the enforcement backstop for arbitral awards not just agreeing to arbitrate, but trusting the Courts to make that agreement mean something if enforcement becomes necessary.

What Do the Court of First Instance and Small Claims Tribunal Figures Show?

Two very different pictures emerge once you split the numbers by division.

Division Claims Total Value Average Claim YoY Change
CFI (all specialised divisions) 110 AED 9.02 billion AED 117.2 million +28%
CFI (main division) 72 AED 112.6 million +18% (avg. more than doubled)
Small Claims Tribunal (SCT) 479 AED 44.7 million AED 94,000 +5%

The CFI is where the real weight sits – 110 claims carrying AED 9.02 billion, or roughly 90% of the entire H1 claim value. And the average claim in the main CFI division more than doubled year-on-year to AED 112.6 million. These are large, complex, high-stakes commercial disputes.

 

The SCT tells a completely different story. 479 claims, nearly 60% of all cases filed, but worth just AED 44.7 million combined, averaging AED 94,000 per claim. This is where individuals and SMEs get fast, accessible resolution for smaller commercial disagreements.

 

If you’re an SME owner, the SCT is likely your practical entry point into the DIFC Courts system. If you’re running a large enterprise with high-value contracts, the CFI and increasingly, opt-in access to it is where your exposure sits.

How Is Enforcement Activity Changing at the DIFC Courts?

Enforcement filings more than doubled: 220 in H1 2026, compared to 106 in H1 2025. That’s more than one enforcement filing every single day of the period.

 

Of those, eight applications were specifically to enforce orders and judgments that originated outside the DIFC Courts entirely. That’s the detail worth sitting with. The DIFC Courts aren’t just a forum where you file a dispute and get a ruling, they’re increasingly a practical enforcement route for judgments won elsewhere.

 

For creditors, claimants, or any business holding a judgment or arbitral award from another jurisdiction, this is a real consideration. Winning a case is one thing. Actually collecting on it is another. A rising enforcement caseload signals the DIFC Courts are being used, and trusted, for exactly that second step.

What Other DIFC Courts Services Grew in H1 2026?

The Courts’ broader ecosystem grew alongside the caseload:

  • Wills Service: 1,925 wills registered in H1 2026 alone, pushing total registrations since inception past 14,300. This service lets non-Muslim residents and investors plan succession under a familiar legal framework rather than default UAE inheritance rules.

  • Registered lawyers: 1,351 practitioners across 256 law firms are now registered with the Courts.

  • Pro Bono Programme: Assisted 315 individuals through 55 volunteer lawyers across 39 firms.

  • Digital delivery: 99% of proceedings, 818 of 824, were conducted online, and the Courts issued 1,766 digital orders and judgments during the period.

The Wills Service growth is worth a second look if you’re an expat business owner or investor. Succession planning is often the thing that gets pushed to “later” until a family member needs it urgently.

What Does This Mean for Businesses Operating in Dubai?

Rising claim values and rising opt-in numbers aren’t just court statistics. They’re a signal about how commercial risk is being managed in Dubai right now.

 

If your contracts don’t specify a dispute-resolution jurisdiction, or if they default to something you haven’t reviewed in years, this is a good moment to check. Opt-in jurisdiction isn’t automatic you have to draft for it. And with the average CFI claim now sitting above AED 112 million, the cost of getting that clause wrong keeps climbing.

 

The same logic applies to counterparty risk assessment. If you’re entering a joint venture, acquiring a business, or extending significant credit terms, understanding where disputes would be resolved and how enforceable a judgment there would actually be is part of proper due diligence, not an afterthought.

How ADEPTS Can Help

Reviewing contracts, structuring deals, and assessing counterparty risk gets complicated fast, especially when the numbers involved are this large.

 

ADEPTS supports UAE businesses on the financial and commercial side of exactly these decisions:

We’re not a law firm, and we won’t draft your jurisdiction clause. But we will make sure the financial picture behind your contracts, valuations, and deal structures is solid enough to withstand scrutiny.

Conclusion

A record caseload and a record claim value tell the same story from two angles: businesses trust Dubai’s dispute-resolution infrastructure enough to bring their biggest, most complex disagreements there and increasingly, they’re choosing to, not being forced to.

 

That’s the real signal in the opt-in numbers. Nearly one in three cases arrived by choice. As the DIFC Courts move further into their five-year strategy, expect these figures to keep climbing – and expect the businesses that reviewed their contracts early to be in a stronger position than the ones who didn’t.

FAQs:

The DIFC Courts reported 810 cases filed between January and June 2026, a 25% increase year-on-year, with a combined claim value of AED 10.02 billion up 48% from H1 2025.

Opt-in jurisdiction lets any two parties, even those with no mandatory DIFC connection, choose the DIFC Courts to resolve their disputes by including a jurisdiction clause in their contract. In H1 2026, 243 of 810 cases (30%) were opt-in.

AED 10.02 billion (USD 2.73 billion) across 810 cases, averaging AED 55 million in claims filed every day of the period.

The CFI handles large, complex commercial disputes 110 claims worth AED 9.02 billion in H1 2026, averaging AED 117.2 million each. The SCT handles smaller, faster claims for individuals and SMEs 479 claims worth AED 44.7 million total, averaging AED 94,000 each.

No. The Arbitration Division supervises arbitration-related matters, recognizing and enforcing arbitral awards and ruling on jurisdictional issues. Actual arbitration proceedings are run by separate arbitral institutions.

Yes! Any two parties, anywhere in the world, can select the DIFC Courts as their dispute forum by including a jurisdiction clause in their contract. No mandatory UAE connection is required.

Enforcement filings rose from 106 in H1 2025 to 220 in H1 2026, including eight applications to enforce judgments originating outside the DIFC Courts, reflecting growing use of the Courts as a practical route to collect on judgments and awards, not just to win them.

It’s a service that lets non-Muslim residents and investors register wills under a familiar legal framework rather than default UAE inheritance rules. It registered 1,925 new wills in H1 2026, taking total registrations past 14,300 since inception.

Q1 2026 recorded 396 cases worth AED 3.5 billion. The full H1 2026 figures (810 cases, AED 10.02 billion) show claim value accelerated faster than case count in the second quarter, meaning individual disputes grew larger, not just more frequent.

D33 aims to double the size of Dubai’s economy by 2033. The DIFC Courts’ Director has directly tied the Courts’ growth in caseload and claim value to supporting D33 by giving businesses confidence that commercial commitments are clear, enforceable, and respected.

References

Related Articles​​